Power and Politics in an Organization Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Power and Politics in an Organization - Essay ExampleFor instance, leaders be assigned a higher level of tycoon to enable them manage those who argon below them. In principal, distribution of origin in an judicature is a tool to get things done. There has been a contention as to whether there exist a clear cut boundary between organisational cater and organizational politics in any particular business system. This paper get out focus on the differences between organizational force out and organizational politics. The role of leaders in an organizational set up is to control effectively those workers that are directly below them. Power has been identified as a exact tool that enables leaders to increase their dependability in their management roles. The best strategy for managers to optimize their power is to increase the workers dependence on them. Dependence notify be assessed on the extent to which the workers will convolute to the managers for critical decisions or solu tions for organizational problems. However, power can be categorized into two, either as power over or the power to depending on the purpose of its use (Clegg and Haugaard 2012, 115). The former has been used to express a negative power that is bureaucratic that is solely meant to increase the individualistic dominance. On the other hand, the power to is preparedness of right to implement or act within ones capacity. In brief, organizational power can be defined as the capacity one party has to influence the behavior of another party in an organization. On the other hand, organizational politics has been often been termed as power in action which defines slack attempt to influence the actions of individuals within an organization. The intention of a political action is to act outside the appointed role in an attempt to manipulate the natural balance of power within an organization. In essence, perpetrators of organizational politics are individualistic people whose intention is t o define new authority boundaries in severalise to have control over the others in business set up (Mauws and Dyck 2005, 34). This resistant of behavior is associated with the aptness of the key decision making tools in an organization to remain open to misinterpretation hence big(p) opportunists a loophole to exploit them in order to enjoy unwarranted merits. Organizational politics have been criticized as an ill motive that is meant to provide individualistic privileges that are not for the best interest of an organization. These two types of power are not only different in their motive principles, but also the way they are acquired. The essence of management power is to promote the goals and objectives of the organization through team building and cohesive reasoning. This kind of power allows every employee to be answerable to a higher power while still performing within their power and ability to handle organizational roles that are defined by the position they hold. The mo tivation of this kind of power is to ensure that there is one key of decision maker to avoid difference of opinion of opinions within the organization. On the other hand, the political behaviour is meant to overturn the organizational power by workout powers outside the roles defined by the organization. Its intention is to secure rights that benefit one person rather than the organization (Porter, Angle and Allen 2003, 22-27). While the organizational power is meant to manage the vital business resources to drive an organization to success, politicians will misinterpret their roles in order to hoard organizational privileges for their own benefit. Economists have identified numerous strategies that can be used for empowerment of people in a business system. One