Influence the Age of Exploration Had on the New World and Africa Essay

The Europeans, during the Age of geographic expedition, had an influence on some(prenominal) the revolutionary worldly concern across the Atlantic Ocean, and the much closer continent of Africa. In both Africa and the New terra firma, Europeans had similar influences in that they negatively affected the domestics in their inquisition for riches such as spices and precious metals, and wherever they traveled they would rotate Christianity to the natives. One example of this is when Cortes arrived in the Aztec empire he demanded they convert to Christianity, and when the Portuguese began colonizing east Africa it didnt take long for the Jesuits to come. However the give out of diseases, the striver trade, and the sparing takeover of born(p) goods differed in the New World and Africa. Africans were wedded to the diseases of Europe, the natives of the Americas were not en buckle downd as the Africans were, and the Europeans were unable to take over the natural resources of the Africans because of their beardown(prenominal)er disposal structure.In both the New World and Africa the Europeans were constantly in await of riches and devoted to the imbue of the Christian faith. Christopher Columbuss stolon expedition across the Atlantic was in search for spices. In Africa, they cherished precious metals such as gold. In the New World and Africa the native people had their land taken from them by the Europeans so that they could search for these worthful things. When the Portuguese were settling the east African coast they oblige the loss leader of the Mwene Mutapa to grant large sections of land to their officials. In the New World the natives in addition lost land but the Europeans were much more forceful. When Cortes came to the Aztec city of Tenochtitlan a battle broke out that killed the majority of the local population. This negatively influenced both the two worlds. Another influence on the native population was the spread of Christianity.The Spanish had forced the Aztecs to convert to Christianity but when they refused, a battle broke out. In Africa Jesuits had started to come to the Portuguese settlements in hopes to convert natives. Although the Portuguese Jesuits were slight violent than the conquistadors, both Africa and the New World were influenced by the spread of Christianity European exploration and colonization had different effects on the New World in contrast with Africa in regards to disease effecting society, the effect politics had on slave trade, as well as the economic takeover of natural goods in the New World. European diseases alone wiped out at least(prenominal) half the population of the Americas. When Columbus arrived toHispaniola the population was 100,000 but just 77 years later and it had dwindled to 300. Diseases had a massive impact on the New World whereas it had little to no effect on Africa. Due to the situation that Africa is so much nearer to Europe, they had more exposure to these di seases, specifically Malaria. African stems were able to build up a starchyer immunity to the diseases carried be European therefore it had contact with Europe via the Trans Saharan Trade Route, it is believed that African ancestor exposure to many diseases created resistance in further African generations.Therefore, the African population was much less effected by diseases carried by Europeans explorers than the native Americans. When the Europeans arrived to the Americas they were able to take the population by storm. The Native Americans were weak and vulnerable compared to the Spanish, who had horses and modern weapons. Columbus himself called these people nave innocents. Due to their innocence it was on the loose(p) for the Spanish to catch up with them and put them to work in sugar lecture fields. This was quite the opposite however of the slaves captured from Africa. These slaves were actually negotiated between African slave traders and the Europeans. Slave merchants w ere paid with East Asian textiles, furniture, and spices. This differentiates from the completely forced capture of the slaves in the Americas because Africa was already well established.The indigenous people had a strong form of government and trade was strong along the Trans Saharan caravan Trade Route. The Native Americans on the other hand did not capture a stable enough government to withstand the Europeans. Looking at this form and economical stand point, natural resources were taken over in the Americas by the explorers. They harvested all the sugar cane, gold, and silver for their own trade purposes. The Indians were forced to work the fields, not own them like before. In Africa though, due to its strong establishment, Europeans could not forcibly take resources.Instead they negotiated and traded with slaver merchants to get what they wanted slaves who would be forced to go the Americas to be the labor force for yield the natural resources there. The New World and Africa were affected by the Europeans during the Age of Exploration in similar and opposite modes. Both were negatively affected in the Europeans search for riches and spices. They were also influenced by the spread of Christianity by the Portuguese Jesuits and Spanish conquistadors. There were differences however in the way Europeandiseases effected the foreign populations, how slavery in Africa was handled compared to the New World, and the economic takeover of natural goods in the societies.